How to select the right shaft coupling for a rotary encoder

Abssacvisit website


This article from Abssac offers some useful tips and advice for selecting the correct type of shaft coupling for rotary encoder applications.

How to select the right shaft coupling for a rotary encoderToo many designers spend time and money on high-accuracy position and speed monitoring devices, such as rotary encoders, only to compromise their performance by using an inappropriate shaft coupling. Shaft encoders are accurate instruments, capable of extremely high angular resolution, and are normally supplied as servo- or flange-mounted units, with protruding shafts. Even the smallest amounts of misalignment between driven and driving shafts can produce side and end loads that will, inevitably, reduce the life of the internal bearings and the accuracy of the encoder.

Drives that impose side loads, such as direct gear couplings, should not be used; likewise, manufacturing rotary encoders with larger bearings does not provide a universal solution. The increase in bearing friction also increases torque, inertia and, in certain cases, shaft windup, which can cause serious limitations in applications, especially where the instrument must respond accurately to acceleration, deceleration or rapid bidirectional stops and starts. Neither is it a solution to couple the encoder via a long shaft whose flexibility accommodates alignment errors, since this potentially introduces vibration problems and, again, greatly increases inertia and windup.

Except in specialised cases where the encoder is integrated with other system components, it is necessary to provide a torsionally stiff, flexible interface between the shaft encoder and the input variable. Usually this takes the form of a flexible shaft coupling. Inevitably, the shaft coupling will impose its own limitations on the system in the form of side loads, increased torque and introduced errors. There are about 35 different flexible coupling designs but, in Abssac's 30+ years of experience, very few are suitable for use with rotary encoders.

A rough rule of thumb can be applied when choosing the correct type of flexible shaft coupling for use with rotary encoders. The following types of coupling should be avoided:

  • Couplings that do not provide unconditional constant velocity
  • Designs that are incapable of simultaneously accommodating all combinations of angular and lateral shaft misalignment
  • Coupling designs with insufficient torsional stiffness
  • Designs that transfer excessive side loads on to the encoder bearings
  • A mechanical set up that has insufficient axial compliance
  • Designs that introduce mechanical backlash into the system
  • Shaft couplings that introduce high inertia, friction or vibration
  • Designs that are not suitable to the application's environment

Although not one single design of shaft coupling is the answer to all rotary encoder connection problems, the mechanical designer's choice should be based on the particular requirements of the system.

Five candidate couplings

Here we look at five coupling types and consider their suitability. We start with the standard universal joint design and, although this design of shaft coupling is not ideal for encoder use, it illustrates the basic principles of rotary connection.

Hooke's joint

A Hooke's joint is a single-joint shaft coupling capable of compensating for angular misalignment when the axes of driving and driven shafts coincide at the fulcrum of the coupling. This type of design cannot compensate for lateral misalignment or accommodate any axial compliance. It is not a constant-velocity shaft coupling, since it has an inherent cyclic error occurring twice per revolution, changing the output velocity and causing torsional vibration at high speed.

Cardon coupling

The Cardan coupling consists of two Hooke's joints connected by a shaft. The design compensates for lateral misalignment, while providing a constant-velocity drive, but it cannot accept angular misalignments between shafts, as these cause cyclic errors. In the case of lateral misalignment, the driving and driven shaft move in unison, but the central shaft must constantly change speed to compensate for the cyclic errors of the two Hooke’s joints. This can cause vibration at high speed. By incorporating a sliding telescopic joint in the central shaft (typically by means of splines) twisting can be prevented and this arrangement may enable some angular compliance as well as enabling the coupling to accommodate end play. However, this set up ultimately introduces backlash and other penalties to the system. In general, it may be said that an accurately made Cardan coupling is expensive to produce and that simpler, more appropriate couplings are available for use with encoders and similar positional instruments.

Double-diaphragm disc coupling

The double-diaphragm coupling is a variant of the Cardan coupling and, like its parent, delivers a constant-velocity drive in cases of parallel misalignment, but without cyclic errors if angular misalignment is also present. Backlash and hysteresis are low, but only small misalignments may be accommodated, including a limited amount of axial float. If the coupling is misapplied and overstressed, the diaphragms may fatigue at their points of attachment. There are several couplings that may be considered as being derived from the double-diaphragm type, including designs with multiple diaphragms, each with multiple points of attachment and sometimes moulded in flexible plastic. In others, bonded discs of elastomer material replace the diaphragms.

Bellows coupling

The bellows coupling has been in use for over 60 years and is one of the most satisfactory designs for use with encoder drives. The design combines high torsional rigidity, angular flexibility and axial compliance, and will accommodate an amount of parallel misalignment depending on the number of bellows convolutions. It also offers low moments of inertia and can transmit rotary motion without cyclic errors or backlash. Pitfalls of the design can be that the bellows material is not homogeneous or of uniform thickness, or if the coupling is not used within the material's elastic limit. In general, however, the bellows coupling is more robust and capable of transmitting more torque at greater shaft offsets. In this respect, it is claimed that electrodeposited nickel bellows provide superior characteristics. Bellows couplings are somewhat vulnerable to external physical damage; for example the careless use of hand tools during maintenance or assembly work can cause abrasions or dents that degrade performance.

Helical beam coupling

Helical couplings have been in existence for over 50 years and are made in one piece, machined from a bar of aluminium alloy or austenitic stainless steel, to ensure uniformity of flexural spring rate for all angles of rotation. The centre of the bar stock is bored out and a helical slit or slits are cut from the outer surface, through to the bore, so that the coupling resembles a flat helical spring of ribbonlike cross-section. The Helical beam coupling has very similar characteristics to the bellows coupling and, like it, is available in a variety of styles. Where the helical beam shaft coupling excels in the connection of rotary positional devices is its ability to provide a range of torsional stiffnesses for a given diameter. The coupling also offers the designer the chance to design unique end attachments into the single-piece design, often enabling the part to be multifunctional. No other coupling can achieve this tunability.


There are some practical considerations for selecting a coupling for positional encoder applications. Always design for the minimum possible misalignment between the driving and driven shafts; the less compensation the coupling has to provide, the better the job it will do and the loads on the encoder's bearings will also be reduced. Both shafts should be close fits in the couplings because loose fits promote imbalance and degrade performance. Remember that at some time the coupling or encoder will have to be removed for maintenance purposes, so that methods of attachment that are too permanent should be avoided. These include the use of anaerobic jointing compounds, grub screws that deform the surface of the shafts they secure to, and force-fits. The use of excessive force when dismantling can damage the shafts and bearings of associated components, not least in the encoders.

Follow the link for more information about Abssac's shaft couplings for rotary encoders and other applications.

© Copyright 2006-14 Damte Ltd.