How to design machine guards to deter defeating of interlocks

Jeremy Procter, a Member of BSI's MCE/3 committee, former Convenor of the European Standards Committee responsible for Machine Guards (CEN TC114 WG11), and Managing Director of Procter Machine Guarding, explains how the careful design of machine guards can successfully discourage the dangerous practice of defeating interlocks during setting, operation and maintenance.

The Health and Safety Executive has recently published a report entitled Identifying the human factors associated with the defeating of interlocks on Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines (reference RR974), which was prepared on the HSE's behalf by the Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL), an agency of the HSE. The research was undertaken on a qualitative basis using a relatively small sample of SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises), so the report cautions against extrapolating from the results; nonetheless, the findings are such that important lessons can be learnt by designers of all types of machines with interlocked guards, not just CNC machine tools.

First, it is striking how common it is for CNC machines to have the guard interlocks defeated during setting and operation, with supervisors and managers often 'turning a blind eye' to the practice. Among the operatives, supervisors and managers interviewed for the research, it was generally felt that defeating the guard interlocks was the norm, rather than an uncommon practice.

Why operatives defeat machine guard interlocks

The reasons given for defeating interlocks varied, but typically operators complained that process visibility was poor or inadequate with guards in place, particularly during set-up and when proving new CNC programs. A related issue was that clear panels quickly became marked by swarf, which restricted visibility. Another reason was that large or awkwardly-shaped workpieces made the use of physical guards impractical, particularly for one-offs or short production runs when 'as fitted' machine guards would clash with the workpiece. In some cases it was claimed that operatives could be more productive by clearing swarf without having to stop machines, or by deburring one area of a workpiece while others were still being machined.

Operatives were generally aware of the hazards associated with machine tools but often believed that their experience meant they could 'safely' operate machines without guards because they were aware of the hazards and could take appropriate precautions - such as remaining at a safe distance and running the machine at low speeds. Some of the experienced operatives also commented that warning signs were of little use because the messages they conveyed were 'common sense'; these signs were thought to be effective for apprentices only.

Techniques employed to defeat guard interlocks included the removal of guards, removal of switches and the use of dummy actuators in electromechanical switches. It appears that older machines and 'semi-CNC' machines (typically those with limited CNC functionality or manual machines that had been modified by the addition of CNC equipment) tend to have interlocks that are easier to defeat. During the course of their research, the HSL team spoke to individuals who expressed the view that guards and interlocks were installed not so much for safeguarding operatives but for protecting machine designers who wished to claim compliance with safety standards and Regulations.

Guard design

It would be easy for machine builders to blame operatives and say that guards are there to provide protection and that interlocks should not be overridden, but there is a strong argument in favour of designing guards that provide protection without hindering production - and which, therefore, eliminate the need for the interlocks to be defeated. The main standard for machine guards is BS EN 953:1997+A1:2009, Safety of Machinery. Guards. General requirements for the design and construction of fixed and movable guards. This covers all types of machinery, from simple drive couplings to very complex installations involving robots, conveyors and processing machinery. The standard lists those aspects of machinery, people and guards that need to be considered, and this includes ergonomics. For instance, in section 5, Principal requirements for the design and construction of guards, the following points are made explicitly:

5.2.4 Viewing: To minimise the need to remove them, guards shall be designed and constructed to offer adequate viewing of the process.

5.2.5 Ergonomic aspects: Guards shall be designed and constructed taking into account ergonomic principles (see also EN ISO 12100-2:2003, 4.8.2 and 4.8.3). [NB EN ISO 12100-2:2003 has since been superseded by EN ISO 12100:2010 but the corresponding clauses can still be found in sub-section 4.8, Observing ergonomic principles.]

In addition, BS EN 953 makes it clear that foreseeable use and reasonably foreseeable misuse should be taken into account, and that provision should be made for replacement of degradable parts.

BS EN 953 is a Type B standard, meaning that Type C standards can supplement or modify its provisions. Type C standards are published for a variety of different machines including, for example, milling machines (BS EN 13128:2001+A2:2009) and turning machines (BS EN ISO 23125:2010). These two standards make specific references to both guarding and interlocking, so designers need to be familiar with all relevant standards when designing the guarding, interlocking and safety-related control system.

Practical measures

In terms of the practical measures that can be taken when designing machine guards, one of the most important is to discuss with operatives how the machine will be used. A better understanding of all operations - from setting to running, observing, cleaning and measuring - can help the designer to accommodate the operative's requirements in a way that, as far as practicable, eliminates the need to run the machine with guards open (note that the safety-related control system can be designed to allow the machine to run with restricted performance when the guards are open). In addition, viewing panels can be incorporated in positions that will provide adequate process visibility; if appropriate, such panels should be constructed from abrasion-resistant materials and/or be easily replaceable. The choice of guard interlock should be guided by a machine risk assessment but, if it is likely that interlocks will be defeated using dummy actuators, the guard designer could specify uniquely-coded RFID switches or similar devices that are more difficult to defeat; of course, such switches and actuators must be attached to the guards and machine frame in such a way that they cannot be removed easily using readily available tools.

Other measures to be considered include better machine lighting to improve visibility, and installing cameras that enable close-up images of the process to be viewed safely on a monitor outside the danger zone. If cameras are installed, however, they need to be protected so that they do not themselves have their view restricted by swarf or cutting fluid, or their lens or protective screen damaged.

Guard design and manufacture - in-house or out-source?

Whether machine builders are manufacturing one-offs or series machines, taking full responsibility for the guarding in-house often turns out to be more expensive and takes longer than out-sourcing it to a specialist. Furthermore, machine builders are not always as familiar with the guarding standards as designers employed by specialist guarding companies, which runs the risk of the guards being non-compliant or over-engineered.

Procter Machine Guarding claims to be the UK's leading machinery guarding specialist, offering a comprehensive service to survey, design, manufacture and install machine guards nationwide. All guards are designed to comply with EC and HSE requirements and are CE marked or issued with a Declaration of Conformity as appropriate on completion. When necessary, Procter works closely with other suppliers to ensure that interlocking, light curtains and safety-related control systems function correctly in conjunction with the physical guarding. All of this can help machine builders to ensure that guards are cost-effective, ergonomic and standards-compliant so that the complete machine can be CE marked to the Machinery Directive.

Follow the link to find out more about custom-designed machine guards and the services available from Procter Machine Guarding.

Procter Machine Safety

11. Pantglas Industrial Estate
Bedwas
Caerphilly
CF83 8XD
UNITED KINGDOM

+44 (0)2920 855 758

mbinfo@machinesafety.co.uk

www.machinesafety.co.uk

More from Procter Machine Safety

Free updated Safety Distance Calculator tool, at the ready

Posted 2 weeks ago

Standards compliant guarding for new laser cutting machine

Posted 7 months ago

Procter releases free, updated safety distance and risk calculators

Posted 1 year ago

Procter Brothers Ltd announces Management Buyout

Posted 1 year ago

Satech BlueGuard stainless steel perimeter guarding from Procter

Posted 1 year ago

Free guide: machine guarding for waste management and recycling

Posted 1 year ago

What has changed in machine safety standard BS EN 60204-1:2018?

Posted 2 years ago

Updated guide to machinery safety standards

Posted 2 years ago

New range of safety and protection products from Procter

Posted 3 years ago

Machine risk assessment service from Procter Machine Safety

Posted 3 years ago

Bespoke acoustic enclosures from Procter Machine Safety

Posted 3 years ago

How ISO 12100 relates to type-B and type-C standards

Posted 3 years ago

Free email newsletter covers all aspects of machinery safety

Posted 3 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 3 years ago

Procter Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards, 12th Edition

Posted 3 years ago

Machine risk assessment and PUWER inspection services

Posted 3 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 3 years ago

Procter's new website incorporates machine guard e-shop

Posted 3 years ago

Procter apprentice wins Learner of the Year award

Posted 3 years ago

New machine risk assessment and PUWER services from Procter

Posted 3 years ago

Procter Bros apprentice shortlisted for prestigious EEF award

Posted 4 years ago

Darren Rhodes is new Managing Director of Procter Bros Group

Posted 4 years ago

Procter Machine Guarding wins BSIF customer service award

Posted 4 years ago

Procter Machine Guarding expert joins BSI standards committee

Posted 4 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 4 years ago

High-quality machine guards designed, manufactured and installed

Posted 4 years ago

Free White Paper: benefits of acoustic enclosures for machines

Posted 4 years ago

Procter supports European Week for Safety and Health at Work

Posted 4 years ago

BS EN ISO 14122 download: free White Paper on machinery access

Posted 4 years ago

White Paper: machine guarding and PUWER assessments

Posted 5 years ago

Brexit implications for machine safety standards and regulations

Posted 5 years ago

Updated and expanded Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards

Posted 5 years ago

BS EN ISO 14123-1:2015, guarding against hazardous emissions

Posted 5 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 5 years ago

Free download: EN 349 White Paper explains minimum gaps

Posted 5 years ago

Videos show impact tests on modular perimeter guarding

Posted 6 years ago

Free machine safety downloads from Procter Machine Guarding

Posted 6 years ago

Free White Paper explains requirements for conveyor guarding

Posted 6 years ago

Online guide to perimeter guarding for robots and robot cells

Posted 6 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 6 years ago

Free download: PD 5304:2014 White Paper detailing changes

Posted 6 years ago

New video demonstrates Procter Machine Guarding's capabilities

Posted 6 years ago

The differences between guarding standards ISO 14120 and EN 953

Posted 6 years ago

Bosch Rexroth EcoSafe guarding now available from Procter

Posted 6 years ago

Is a drill guard necessary or can you rely on operator skill?

Posted 7 years ago

BS EN ISO 12100 Risk Assessment Calculator - video walkthrough

Posted 7 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 7 years ago

EN ISO 13857 Safety Distance Calculator - video walkthrough

Posted 7 years ago

High-speed roller door provides rapid machine access

Posted 7 years ago

High-quality modular aluminium machine guarding from Procter

Posted 7 years ago

Ten things you need to know about machine guarding standards

Posted 7 years ago

How to specify a modular perimeter guarding system

Posted 7 years ago

Satech modular guarding system offers advantages for robot cells

Posted 7 years ago

Procter Machine Guarding installs workshop guards for Tata Steel

Posted 7 years ago

Free Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards, 10th Edition

Posted 7 years ago

Claim a free machinery safety memory stick at MACH

Posted 7 years ago

Fixings for fixed machine guards - further clarification

Posted 7 years ago

User-friendly list of machinery safety standards

Posted 7 years ago

Free Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards, 9th Edition

Posted 8 years ago

Machinery safety standards listed on updated web page

Posted 8 years ago

New edition of Free White Paper: CE marking of machine guards

Posted 8 years ago

Procter named Preferred Provider of guarding by insurer QBE

Posted 8 years ago

New HSE advice on CE marking assemblies of machinery

Posted 9 years ago

Machine guarding - design and build or outsource?

Posted 9 years ago

Free download: BS EN ISO 12100:2010 Risk Assessment Calculator

Posted 9 years ago

Guards for Webster and Bennett vertical boring machines

Posted 10 years ago

Free guide to workshop safety - third edition now published

Posted 10 years ago

Custom-built guarding installed in automated warehouse

Posted 10 years ago

HSE reduces machine inspections, so users must do more

Posted 10 years ago

Safe maintenance and the influence of machine guard design

Posted 10 years ago

Modular perimeter guarding for automated high-bay warehouse

Posted 10 years ago

Nelsa guards brochure: free download

Posted 10 years ago

Nelsa standard machine shop guards available from Procter

Posted 10 years ago

Free guide to workshop safety - second edition published

Posted 11 years ago

Modular perimeter guarding is easily installed by customer

Posted 11 years ago

What does 'as low as reasonably practicable' mean?

Posted 11 years ago

Modular machine guarding system offers unlimited versatility

Posted 11 years ago

Procter publishes updated Guide to New Machinery Directive

Posted 11 years ago

Updated guide to machine guarding standards

Posted 11 years ago

Machine guarding pays for itself

Posted 11 years ago

CE marking machine guards to Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC

Posted 11 years ago

New machine guards for old machinery

Posted 12 years ago

Fixings for fixed guards: White Paper explains requirements

Posted 12 years ago

FREE guide to machinery guarding standards - new edition

Posted 12 years ago

Workshop Safety - a free guide to machine tool guarding

Posted 12 years ago

BS EN 953:1997 +A1:2009 - a review of the guarding standard

Posted 12 years ago

How to specify fasteners for fixed guards on machinery

Posted 12 years ago

FREE machine guarding compliance surveys

Posted 12 years ago

Procter to exhibit Nelsa machine shop guards

Posted 12 years ago

Free machinery safety CD-Rom at Safety & Health Expo

Posted 12 years ago

Procter and ISS Safety offer machinery safety service

Posted 12 years ago

Updated guide lists new machine guarding standards

Posted 13 years ago

Free download: EN ISO 13857 Safety Distance Calculator

Posted 13 years ago

ISO 13857, the standard for machinery safety distances

Posted 13 years ago

Safety of machinery: EN ISO 12100-1 and EN ISO 12100-2

Posted 13 years ago

Collect a free machinery safety CD-Rom at MACH 2008

Posted 13 years ago

Easy access to machinery safety information

Posted 13 years ago

Safeguarding machinery in compliance with BS 4163

Posted 13 years ago

Procter publishes guide to new Machinery Directive

Posted 13 years ago

Free kit of machinery safety guides and software tools

Posted 14 years ago

Free download: EN ISO 14121-1 machine risk assessment calculator

Posted 14 years ago

Free machine risk assessment calculator

Posted 14 years ago

How and why to specify cable ducting on machines

Posted 14 years ago

Free machine accident investigation kit - just in case...

Posted 14 years ago

Low-cost modular guarding can be installed by users

Posted 14 years ago

How to design guarding for food and drink machinery

Posted 14 years ago

New and updated machine safety standards

Posted 14 years ago

Review: PD 5304:2005 'Guidance on safe use of machinery'

Posted 14 years ago

How to cut the cost of machine tool enclosure guards

Posted 14 years ago

Free guide to machinery guarding standards

Posted 14 years ago

Free guide to machinery guarding standards (fourth edition)

Posted 14 years ago

More technical articles