How to specify fasteners for fixed guards on machinery

Jeremy Procter, a Member of BSI's MCE/3 committee, Convenor of the European Standards Committee responsible for Machine Guards (CEN TC114 WG11), and Managing Director of Procter Machine Guarding, explains how to select the right type of fasteners for fixed guards, given the new requirements in the latest version of the guarding standard BS EN 953.

BS EN 953:1997 +A1:2009, Safety of machinery. Guards. General requirements for the design and construction of fixed and movable guards, is a new version of BS EN 953 with amendments to align it with the new Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC that comes into force at the end of 2009. Compared with the previous versions of the standard and Machinery Directive, there is now a requirement that fixings for fixed guards shall remain attached to the guard or the machinery when the guard is removed. The underlying logic is that retained (or captive) fasteners will not be lost when the guard is removed - for maintenance, for example - so it is much less likely that the guard will be replaced with insufficient fixings, which could allow hazardous parts of the machinery to be accessed. [There is more information in this technical article about BS EN 953:1997 +A1:2009.]

However, it is not just a simple matter of specifying retained fasteners for any part identified on the manufacturing drawing as a 'guard' because the formal definition of a guard needs to be taken into account - and it does not help that the definition differs between the standard and the Machinery Directive.

Definitions

BS EN 953:1997 +A1:2009, Clause 3 (Definitions), defines a guard as a "physical barrier, designed as part of a machine, to provide protection." In contrast, item 1.1.1. (f) of the Essential Health and Safety Requirements in the new Machinery Directive defines a guard as "a part of the machinery used specifically to provide protection by means of a physical barrier." This raises the question as to whether other parts of the machine - such as weather-proof covers and chutes - are deemed to be 'guards' and therefore need to be fixed using retained fasteners, as they are not designed 'specifically' to provide protection.

For all practical purposes, machine designers should use the definition of a guard given in BS EN 953:1997 +A1:2009. Indeed, the standard provides additional clarification within the definition of a guard as follows: "Note 2. Depending on its design, a guard may be called eg casing, shield, cover, screen, door, enclosing guard." Interpreting the term 'specifically' from the Directive in order to relax the requirements relating to these parts of the machine would be incorrect, as they often do provide protection, if only as a secondary function.

Can hazards be reached?

A sensible approach to take would be to consider whether, if a component were removed, hazardous parts could be accessed. Here it is essential to consult EN ISO 13857:2008, Safety of machinery - Safety distances to prevent hazard zones being reached by upper and lower limbs (for which Procter Machine Guarding offers a free Reach Distance Calculator). If the analysis indicates that, say, removing a roof panel will not provide access to hazardous parts of the machinery, then there is no need to use retained fasteners on that panel. But be aware that EN ISO 13857:2008 only considers hazards associated with reaching over, under, around and through guards; if there are potential hazards from, say, parts or hazardous substances being ejected from the machine, then those panels will still be classed as guards and will need to be fixed with retained fasteners.

Sub-clause 7.2 (Retained fastenings) of BS EN 953:1997 +A1:2009 states: "Where it is foreseen (eg maintenance) that the fixed guard will be removed then the fastenings shall remain attached to the guard or to the machinery." It therefore follows that if it is not foreseen that the guards will be removed for maintenance, cleaning or other reasons, then there is no requirement to use retained fasteners.

Fastener selection and design considerations

Having identified the parts of the machine that should be treated as fixed guards and which might be removed for maintenance or other purposes, the designer can start selecting suitable fastenings. Unfortunately this cannot be done in isolation, as the type of fastener selected will have a bearing on the design of the guard and/or the structure to which it is attached, and vice versa. Furthermore, retained fastenings are likely to be more expensive to purchase and install than conventional screws, so it might be that minor changes to the design of the assembly can yield benefits. For example, if a guard panel has previously been manufactured from relatively thin, flat sheet metal, and installed using a number of screws around the periphery, then it might be beneficial to form a small return on one or more edges of the panel to impart stiffness and reduce the number of fasteners required. Alternatively (or additionally) it might be cost-effective to design guards that hook in on one edge and only need fasteners on the opposite edge, though the guard needs to be incapable of remaining in place if it is not hooked into place correctly.

Further design measures that could be considered include ensuring there is no need to remove guards in order to access lubrication points, adjust conveyor tracking or perform similar maintenance operations. It might also be that a large cover panel protecting a relatively small hazard can be redesigned as two panels, so that only the panel providing protection needs retained fasteners.

Quick-release fasteners

The optimum choice of retained fastener for a particular fixed guard will depend on a number of factors. If the machine is a one-off, the production processes may be different from those for a mass-produced machine. This has implications for the tolerances that can be achieved, which, in turn, will make some types of fastener more suitable than others (some require good alignment of the guard and machine structure, whereas others are more tolerant of misalignment). In addition, the designer must assess whether the guard will need to be removed periodically for maintenance or cleaning, or whether it is only to be removed, say, in the event of a motor burning out. If regular maintenance is required, it might be better to specify push-turn or quarter-turn fasteners that are quick to remove and replace, and are tolerant of panel misalignment (depending on the model selected). Beware, however, that there are numerous such fasteners on the market, but not all of them require a 'tool' for removal (fasteners with a straight screwdriver slot are unsuitable for machine guards, as they can be undone using improvised tools such as a steel rule).

Machines often generate vibrations, so it is important to ensure that whatever fasteners are selected will not shake loose. Something else to bear in mind with retained fasteners is that a damaged fastener will be more difficult to replace than a simple screw. While some retained screws are held captive on the panel by, for example, a spring clip in an undercut beneath the head - and can therefore be replaced relatively simply - others are held in place by a clinching process in which the panel material is deformed during fastener installation. Because the material is deformed so as to encroach on an undercut on the fastener, replacement of this type of fastener is likely to be more troublesome. Moreover, it may be impossible to replace the retained fastener with another of the same design.

Depending on the type of fastener selected for a guard, the mating feature on the machine may be a simple threaded hole or an insert that has to be installed in a specially prepared hole. As with the fastener itself, the designer should consider what the course of action would be in the event of the mating feature becoming damaged.

Costs and benefits

Clearly the new requirement for fixed guards to be held in place using retained fasteners (subject to the provisos above) could increase costs for machine builders. However, by considering carefully the requirements for each guard, and by implementing minor changes to the guard or machine design where appropriate, the additional costs can be minimised. Furthermore, one consequence could be that machine maintenance becomes easier and quicker, which will be a major benefit for companies that are striving to operate as efficiently as possible in the current economic climate.

Procter Machine Guarding is one of the UK's leading machinery guarding specialists, with extensive experience in the design, manufacture and installation of close-fitting machine guards and perimeter guards. With detailed knowledge of the applicable standards, as well as a deep understanding of the ergonomic issues relating to machine guarding, Procter can design guards that meet all the necessary safety standards, do not hinder production, and enhance the machine's aesthetics.

To discuss any requirements for machine guarding, please email Procter Machine Guarding at machinesafety@procterbedwas.co.uk or telephone +44 (0)2920 882222. The company also offers a free Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards, which is available from the Free Downloads section of the company's website.

Procter Machine Safety

11. Pantglas Industrial Estate
Bedwas
Caerphilly
CF83 8XD
UNITED KINGDOM

+44 (0)2920 855 758

mbinfo@machinesafety.co.uk

www.machinesafety.co.uk

More from Procter Machine Safety

Standards compliant guarding for new laser cutting machine

Posted 5 months ago

Procter releases free, updated safety distance and risk calculators

Posted 10 months ago

Procter Brothers Ltd announces Management Buyout

Posted 11 months ago

Satech BlueGuard stainless steel perimeter guarding from Procter

Posted 1 year ago

Free guide: machine guarding for waste management and recycling

Posted 1 year ago

What has changed in machine safety standard BS EN 60204-1:2018?

Posted 2 years ago

Updated guide to machinery safety standards

Posted 2 years ago

New range of safety and protection products from Procter

Posted 2 years ago

Machine risk assessment service from Procter Machine Safety

Posted 2 years ago

Bespoke acoustic enclosures from Procter Machine Safety

Posted 3 years ago

How ISO 12100 relates to type-B and type-C standards

Posted 3 years ago

Free email newsletter covers all aspects of machinery safety

Posted 3 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 3 years ago

Procter Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards, 12th Edition

Posted 3 years ago

Machine risk assessment and PUWER inspection services

Posted 3 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 3 years ago

Procter's new website incorporates machine guard e-shop

Posted 3 years ago

Procter apprentice wins Learner of the Year award

Posted 3 years ago

New machine risk assessment and PUWER services from Procter

Posted 3 years ago

Procter Bros apprentice shortlisted for prestigious EEF award

Posted 3 years ago

Darren Rhodes is new Managing Director of Procter Bros Group

Posted 4 years ago

Procter Machine Guarding wins BSIF customer service award

Posted 4 years ago

Procter Machine Guarding expert joins BSI standards committee

Posted 4 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 4 years ago

High-quality machine guards designed, manufactured and installed

Posted 4 years ago

Free White Paper: benefits of acoustic enclosures for machines

Posted 4 years ago

Procter supports European Week for Safety and Health at Work

Posted 4 years ago

BS EN ISO 14122 download: free White Paper on machinery access

Posted 4 years ago

White Paper: machine guarding and PUWER assessments

Posted 4 years ago

Brexit implications for machine safety standards and regulations

Posted 5 years ago

Updated and expanded Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards

Posted 5 years ago

BS EN ISO 14123-1:2015, guarding against hazardous emissions

Posted 5 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 5 years ago

Free download: EN 349 White Paper explains minimum gaps

Posted 5 years ago

Videos show impact tests on modular perimeter guarding

Posted 5 years ago

Free machine safety downloads from Procter Machine Guarding

Posted 5 years ago

Free White Paper explains requirements for conveyor guarding

Posted 6 years ago

Online guide to perimeter guarding for robots and robot cells

Posted 6 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 6 years ago

Free download: PD 5304:2014 White Paper detailing changes

Posted 6 years ago

New video demonstrates Procter Machine Guarding's capabilities

Posted 6 years ago

The differences between guarding standards ISO 14120 and EN 953

Posted 6 years ago

Bosch Rexroth EcoSafe guarding now available from Procter

Posted 6 years ago

Is a drill guard necessary or can you rely on operator skill?

Posted 6 years ago

BS EN ISO 12100 Risk Assessment Calculator - video walkthrough

Posted 6 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 7 years ago

EN ISO 13857 Safety Distance Calculator - video walkthrough

Posted 7 years ago

High-speed roller door provides rapid machine access

Posted 7 years ago

High-quality modular aluminium machine guarding from Procter

Posted 7 years ago

Ten things you need to know about machine guarding standards

Posted 7 years ago

How to specify a modular perimeter guarding system

Posted 7 years ago

Satech modular guarding system offers advantages for robot cells

Posted 7 years ago

Procter Machine Guarding installs workshop guards for Tata Steel

Posted 7 years ago

Free Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards, 10th Edition

Posted 7 years ago

Claim a free machinery safety memory stick at MACH

Posted 7 years ago

Fixings for fixed machine guards - further clarification

Posted 7 years ago

User-friendly list of machinery safety standards

Posted 7 years ago

How to design machine guards to deter defeating of interlocks

Posted 7 years ago

Free Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards, 9th Edition

Posted 8 years ago

Machinery safety standards listed on updated web page

Posted 8 years ago

New edition of Free White Paper: CE marking of machine guards

Posted 8 years ago

Procter named Preferred Provider of guarding by insurer QBE

Posted 8 years ago

New HSE advice on CE marking assemblies of machinery

Posted 9 years ago

Machine guarding - design and build or outsource?

Posted 9 years ago

Free download: BS EN ISO 12100:2010 Risk Assessment Calculator

Posted 9 years ago

Guards for Webster and Bennett vertical boring machines

Posted 9 years ago

Free guide to workshop safety - third edition now published

Posted 9 years ago

Custom-built guarding installed in automated warehouse

Posted 9 years ago

HSE reduces machine inspections, so users must do more

Posted 10 years ago

Safe maintenance and the influence of machine guard design

Posted 10 years ago

Modular perimeter guarding for automated high-bay warehouse

Posted 10 years ago

Nelsa guards brochure: free download

Posted 10 years ago

Nelsa standard machine shop guards available from Procter

Posted 10 years ago

Free guide to workshop safety - second edition published

Posted 10 years ago

Modular perimeter guarding is easily installed by customer

Posted 10 years ago

What does 'as low as reasonably practicable' mean?

Posted 11 years ago

Modular machine guarding system offers unlimited versatility

Posted 11 years ago

Procter publishes updated Guide to New Machinery Directive

Posted 11 years ago

Updated guide to machine guarding standards

Posted 11 years ago

Machine guarding pays for itself

Posted 11 years ago

CE marking machine guards to Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC

Posted 11 years ago

New machine guards for old machinery

Posted 11 years ago

Fixings for fixed guards: White Paper explains requirements

Posted 11 years ago

FREE guide to machinery guarding standards - new edition

Posted 11 years ago

Workshop Safety - a free guide to machine tool guarding

Posted 12 years ago

BS EN 953:1997 +A1:2009 - a review of the guarding standard

Posted 12 years ago

FREE machine guarding compliance surveys

Posted 12 years ago

Procter to exhibit Nelsa machine shop guards

Posted 12 years ago

Free machinery safety CD-Rom at Safety & Health Expo

Posted 12 years ago

Procter and ISS Safety offer machinery safety service

Posted 12 years ago

Updated guide lists new machine guarding standards

Posted 12 years ago

Free download: EN ISO 13857 Safety Distance Calculator

Posted 13 years ago

ISO 13857, the standard for machinery safety distances

Posted 13 years ago

Safety of machinery: EN ISO 12100-1 and EN ISO 12100-2

Posted 13 years ago

Collect a free machinery safety CD-Rom at MACH 2008

Posted 13 years ago

Easy access to machinery safety information

Posted 13 years ago

Safeguarding machinery in compliance with BS 4163

Posted 13 years ago

Procter publishes guide to new Machinery Directive

Posted 13 years ago

Free kit of machinery safety guides and software tools

Posted 13 years ago

Free download: EN ISO 14121-1 machine risk assessment calculator

Posted 13 years ago

Free machine risk assessment calculator

Posted 13 years ago

How and why to specify cable ducting on machines

Posted 14 years ago

Free machine accident investigation kit - just in case...

Posted 14 years ago

Low-cost modular guarding can be installed by users

Posted 14 years ago

How to design guarding for food and drink machinery

Posted 14 years ago

New and updated machine safety standards

Posted 14 years ago

Review: PD 5304:2005 'Guidance on safe use of machinery'

Posted 14 years ago

How to cut the cost of machine tool enclosure guards

Posted 14 years ago

Free guide to machinery guarding standards

Posted 14 years ago

Free guide to machinery guarding standards (fourth edition)

Posted 14 years ago

More technical articles