What does 'as low as reasonably practicable' mean?

Jeremy Procter, a Member of BSI's MCE/3 committee, former Convenor of the European Standards Committee responsible for Machine Guards (CEN TC114 WG11), and Managing Director of Procter Machine Guarding, explains what is meant by machine risks being 'as low as reasonably practicable.'

On 14 June 2007 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) upheld one of the key elements of British health and safety law, namely the use of the phrase 'so far as is reasonably practicable.' This was despite the European Commission's claim that using 'so far as is reasonably practicable' did not implement the Framework Directive (89/391/EEC) on EU employers' duties to protect the health and safety of their workers, as the Directive has no such qualification. The ECJ dismissed the European Commission's case and ordered it to pay the UK Government's costs.

The phrase 'so far as is reasonably practicable' is contained in section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (HSWA): 'it shall be the duty of every employer to ensure 'so far as is reasonably practicable' (SFAIRP) the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees' - though the phrase has existed in English law for considerably longer. Furthermore, rather than it being used as a legal loophole, the phrase has been interpreted in the courts such that it has helped employers in Britain to achieve and maintain an excellent safety record. Speaking after the EJC delivered its verdict, Bill Callaghan, then Chair of the Health and Safety Commission (HSC), stated: "Quite clearly we have been effective in protecting people, as currently we have the best occupational safety record in Europe."

ALARP and SFAIRP

'As low as reasonably practicable' (ALARP) essentially means the same as 'so far as is reasonably practicable' (SFAIRP), with the essence being that risk must be weighed against the money, time and trouble needed to control it, though the decision is always weighted in favour of health and safety. While the phrase is advantageous inasmuch as it provides flexibility, it can also have its drawbacks if, for example, a dutyholder and an enforcement authority disagree on what is reasonably practicable. The HSE (Health and Safety Executive) says that in the majority of cases it decides by referring to 'good practice,' which has been established by discussions with stakeholders to reach a consensus about what is ALARP. However, in complex or new situations, or those where hazards are high, additional formal techniques can be used - including cost-benefit analysis (CBA).

What all this means is that if no further steps are to be taken to reduce risk, the dutyholder - who could be a machine specifier, machine designer or person responsible for machinery in the workplace - must be able to produce evidence to show that the money, time or trouble required would be grossly disproportionate to the risk reduction achieved. In general, the approach should be that the dutyholder adopts the measures offering the highest standard of safety except where they involve grossly disproportionate sacrifices.

Decisions about whether a particular control measure should be implemented can be made more difficult by factors such as the ongoing costs of maintenance, the difficulty and expense associated with ensuring employees wear PPE (personal protective equipment), and the low likelihood of unusual events occurring. In addition, technological developments mean that the 'state of the art' evolves over time, so what might have been prohibitively expensive or difficult to implement in the past may now be 'reasonably practicable.' Bear in mind also that the HSE's guidance to its own staff states: 'We believe it is right that the greater the risk: the higher the proportion [ie the ratio of sacrifice to benefits] may be before being considered 'gross.' But the disproportion must always be gross.' Nevertheless, it often remains the case that a judgement has to be made; there is no simple formula for determining what is ALARP.

What is 'good practice'?

Other considerations include the fact that common practice in an industry may not be viewed as good practice by the enforcement authorities, and the relative impracticality of retrofitting risk-reduction measures on existing plant may mean that the level of risk that is considered to be ALARP may be different to the level that is considered ALARP for new plant.

Here in the UK the majority of prosecutions brought by the HSE in relation to machinery safety are for breaches of the HSWA, and cases often involve arguments relating to whether employers have taken 'reasonably practicable' measures to reduce risk. However, the HSE has also led prosecutions under the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 1992 (sometimes known as SMSR), which is the UK legislation implementing the Machinery Directive. No doubt when the new Machinery Directive (2006/42/EC) comes into force on 29 December 2009 the HSE will not hesitate, where appropriate, to bring prosecutions to court under The Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008. Because of the significant changes contained in the new Directive and Regulations, it is imperative that companies building machines or partly-assembled machines, as well as those performing final assembly or importing machinery for use in the European Economic Area, start preparing now.

Procter Machine Guarding has published a free Guide to the New Machinery Directive, which is available as a PDF from the Free Downloads section of its website.

Procter Machine Safety

11. Pantglas Industrial Estate
Bedwas
Caerphilly
CF83 8XD
UNITED KINGDOM

+44 (0)2920 855 758

mbinfo@machinesafety.co.uk

www.machinesafety.co.uk

More from Procter Machine Safety

Free updated Safety Distance Calculator tool, at the ready

Posted 2 months ago

Standards compliant guarding for new laser cutting machine

Posted 9 months ago

Procter releases free, updated safety distance and risk calculators

Posted 1 year ago

Procter Brothers Ltd announces Management Buyout

Posted 1 year ago

Satech BlueGuard stainless steel perimeter guarding from Procter

Posted 1 year ago

Free guide: machine guarding for waste management and recycling

Posted 1 year ago

What has changed in machine safety standard BS EN 60204-1:2018?

Posted 3 years ago

Updated guide to machinery safety standards

Posted 3 years ago

New range of safety and protection products from Procter

Posted 3 years ago

Machine risk assessment service from Procter Machine Safety

Posted 3 years ago

Bespoke acoustic enclosures from Procter Machine Safety

Posted 3 years ago

How ISO 12100 relates to type-B and type-C standards

Posted 3 years ago

Free email newsletter covers all aspects of machinery safety

Posted 3 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 3 years ago

Procter Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards, 12th Edition

Posted 3 years ago

Machine risk assessment and PUWER inspection services

Posted 3 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 3 years ago

Procter's new website incorporates machine guard e-shop

Posted 3 years ago

Procter apprentice wins Learner of the Year award

Posted 4 years ago

New machine risk assessment and PUWER services from Procter

Posted 4 years ago

Procter Bros apprentice shortlisted for prestigious EEF award

Posted 4 years ago

Darren Rhodes is new Managing Director of Procter Bros Group

Posted 4 years ago

Procter Machine Guarding wins BSIF customer service award

Posted 4 years ago

Procter Machine Guarding expert joins BSI standards committee

Posted 4 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 4 years ago

High-quality machine guards designed, manufactured and installed

Posted 4 years ago

Free White Paper: benefits of acoustic enclosures for machines

Posted 4 years ago

Procter supports European Week for Safety and Health at Work

Posted 5 years ago

BS EN ISO 14122 download: free White Paper on machinery access

Posted 5 years ago

White Paper: machine guarding and PUWER assessments

Posted 5 years ago

Brexit implications for machine safety standards and regulations

Posted 5 years ago

Updated and expanded Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards

Posted 5 years ago

BS EN ISO 14123-1:2015, guarding against hazardous emissions

Posted 5 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 5 years ago

Free download: EN 349 White Paper explains minimum gaps

Posted 5 years ago

Videos show impact tests on modular perimeter guarding

Posted 6 years ago

Free machine safety downloads from Procter Machine Guarding

Posted 6 years ago

Free White Paper explains requirements for conveyor guarding

Posted 6 years ago

Online guide to perimeter guarding for robots and robot cells

Posted 6 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 6 years ago

Free download: PD 5304:2014 White Paper detailing changes

Posted 6 years ago

New video demonstrates Procter Machine Guarding's capabilities

Posted 6 years ago

The differences between guarding standards ISO 14120 and EN 953

Posted 7 years ago

Bosch Rexroth EcoSafe guarding now available from Procter

Posted 7 years ago

Is a drill guard necessary or can you rely on operator skill?

Posted 7 years ago

BS EN ISO 12100 Risk Assessment Calculator - video walkthrough

Posted 7 years ago

Movie of the month

Posted 7 years ago

EN ISO 13857 Safety Distance Calculator - video walkthrough

Posted 7 years ago

High-speed roller door provides rapid machine access

Posted 7 years ago

High-quality modular aluminium machine guarding from Procter

Posted 7 years ago

Ten things you need to know about machine guarding standards

Posted 7 years ago

How to specify a modular perimeter guarding system

Posted 7 years ago

Satech modular guarding system offers advantages for robot cells

Posted 7 years ago

Procter Machine Guarding installs workshop guards for Tata Steel

Posted 7 years ago

Free Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards, 10th Edition

Posted 7 years ago

Claim a free machinery safety memory stick at MACH

Posted 7 years ago

Fixings for fixed machine guards - further clarification

Posted 8 years ago

User-friendly list of machinery safety standards

Posted 8 years ago

How to design machine guards to deter defeating of interlocks

Posted 8 years ago

Free Guide to Machinery Guarding Standards, 9th Edition

Posted 8 years ago

Machinery safety standards listed on updated web page

Posted 8 years ago

New edition of Free White Paper: CE marking of machine guards

Posted 8 years ago

Procter named Preferred Provider of guarding by insurer QBE

Posted 9 years ago

New HSE advice on CE marking assemblies of machinery

Posted 9 years ago

Machine guarding - design and build or outsource?

Posted 9 years ago

Free download: BS EN ISO 12100:2010 Risk Assessment Calculator

Posted 9 years ago

Guards for Webster and Bennett vertical boring machines

Posted 10 years ago

Free guide to workshop safety - third edition now published

Posted 10 years ago

Custom-built guarding installed in automated warehouse

Posted 10 years ago

HSE reduces machine inspections, so users must do more

Posted 10 years ago

Safe maintenance and the influence of machine guard design

Posted 10 years ago

Modular perimeter guarding for automated high-bay warehouse

Posted 10 years ago

Nelsa guards brochure: free download

Posted 11 years ago

Nelsa standard machine shop guards available from Procter

Posted 11 years ago

Free guide to workshop safety - second edition published

Posted 11 years ago

Modular perimeter guarding is easily installed by customer

Posted 11 years ago

Modular machine guarding system offers unlimited versatility

Posted 11 years ago

Procter publishes updated Guide to New Machinery Directive

Posted 11 years ago

Updated guide to machine guarding standards

Posted 11 years ago

Machine guarding pays for itself

Posted 11 years ago

CE marking machine guards to Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC

Posted 11 years ago

New machine guards for old machinery

Posted 12 years ago

Fixings for fixed guards: White Paper explains requirements

Posted 12 years ago

FREE guide to machinery guarding standards - new edition

Posted 12 years ago

Workshop Safety - a free guide to machine tool guarding

Posted 12 years ago

BS EN 953:1997 +A1:2009 - a review of the guarding standard

Posted 12 years ago

How to specify fasteners for fixed guards on machinery

Posted 12 years ago

FREE machine guarding compliance surveys

Posted 12 years ago

Procter to exhibit Nelsa machine shop guards

Posted 12 years ago

Free machinery safety CD-Rom at Safety & Health Expo

Posted 12 years ago

Procter and ISS Safety offer machinery safety service

Posted 12 years ago

Updated guide lists new machine guarding standards

Posted 13 years ago

Free download: EN ISO 13857 Safety Distance Calculator

Posted 13 years ago

ISO 13857, the standard for machinery safety distances

Posted 13 years ago

Safety of machinery: EN ISO 12100-1 and EN ISO 12100-2

Posted 13 years ago

Collect a free machinery safety CD-Rom at MACH 2008

Posted 13 years ago

Easy access to machinery safety information

Posted 13 years ago

Safeguarding machinery in compliance with BS 4163

Posted 13 years ago

Procter publishes guide to new Machinery Directive

Posted 13 years ago

Free kit of machinery safety guides and software tools

Posted 14 years ago

Free download: EN ISO 14121-1 machine risk assessment calculator

Posted 14 years ago

Free machine risk assessment calculator

Posted 14 years ago

How and why to specify cable ducting on machines

Posted 14 years ago

Free machine accident investigation kit - just in case...

Posted 14 years ago

Low-cost modular guarding can be installed by users

Posted 14 years ago

How to design guarding for food and drink machinery

Posted 14 years ago

New and updated machine safety standards

Posted 14 years ago

Review: PD 5304:2005 'Guidance on safe use of machinery'

Posted 15 years ago

How to cut the cost of machine tool enclosure guards

Posted 15 years ago

Free guide to machinery guarding standards

Posted 15 years ago

Free guide to machinery guarding standards (fourth edition)

Posted 15 years ago

More technical articles

Login / Sign up